Why history is hypocritical, It is
difficult after years to find the true facts. I agree with that. For
example,In communist times, the public were told that the Germans
have made the massacre in Katyn. And now the current president of
Iran denies the Holocaust existed.
The history was deformed,
since ancient times, have been reported in Egypt when Pharaoh. It was
beautiful, wise and brave, when in fact he was short, bald, and fat.
It was written so as to please the Pharaoh and he had a sense that
future generations will perceive him as a hero.
When the Gnostic gospels were written in the 2nd and 3 century. they created more than 30 this goal was one, to prove their own view. To prove views need to rely on history or authority, and so the edited their Gospels were substituted the names of the apostles, and these gospels Jesus is an advocate of Gnostic views. In the sixteenth century, Muslims have posted Gospel of Barnabas where Peter denies Jesus was the Son of God, according to the view of Islam.
When the Gnostic gospels were written in the 2nd and 3 century. they created more than 30 this goal was one, to prove their own view. To prove views need to rely on history or authority, and so the edited their Gospels were substituted the names of the apostles, and these gospels Jesus is an advocate of Gnostic views. In the sixteenth century, Muslims have posted Gospel of Barnabas where Peter denies Jesus was the Son of God, according to the view of Islam.
It
is an abomination of the twentieth century when modern Christians
falsify historical facts, lying to those who are unaware, and they
never check whether the date given by a pastor or church agree with
history. This is done so to support their own teaching. Nineteenth
century pastors do not have access to accurate historical sources,
after years discovered that the dates or events were different, and
what they are doing successor? They hold further mistaken dates,
denying any facts, pastors and their followers are silent rely on
their books.
Modern history
Litch calculate the prophetic date of the Apocalypse of John 9. The basis was the year 1299 establishment of the State Ottomans. The calculations led him to 11 August 1840 year. He did not know neither the day nor the month uprising Ottomans so relied on the end date. On 11 August was to take place the fall of the Ottoman Empire and the date shall be the day Adventist Church. Pastors ADS cover your eyes to the fact that the Ottoman Empire was continued into 1922 and it is only the date of their fall, the Ottoman Empire went even many wars and some even winning. So what happened to August 11, 1840
Governor
of Egypt and belonged to the Sultan - Alii rebelled and waged war for
independence and separation from the Ottoman Empire. European
countries have ordered Ali to submit to the Sultan.
In
1841, the European diplomacy won the tender and Egypt and Syria have
returned under the rule of Sultan. Such a situation recognized
Litcham for the collapse of the Ottoman Empire. European countries
decided by the Sultan and he was so weak that he had to accept the
ultimatum. But the ultimatum was not for the sultan but for the
administrator of Egypt Allego. Dated August 11, 1840 ultimatum was
for Ali and not for the Sultan. Ali received a letter that has come
back under the rule of the Ottomans.
It
may still be the land of Egypt but under the rule of Saturn and has
to pay him 25% per annum on income and pay the Sultan fleet. Early
accept the conditions of the sultan only inherited the throne in
Egypt. Is this the fall of the Ottoman sultan and power? because it
is defined Litcham because the sultan took advantage of help European
countries to consolidate his power and regain territories. These
types of exploitation of other countries in order to strengthen its
position has been used for centuries. Every wise leader would do the
same. Poland uses the help of Western countries / European finance /
does that mean the collapse of Polish, he assisted other countries?
Rather build the country. The leaders of almost all countries in the
world eager to enjoy the support of Western countries, not only
financially but also militarily. Does the aid Ottomans it was their
downfall or rather to strengthen? Litch he described it as a
collapse.
Ottomans got
independent, full rights of maritime and they can decide who will
benefit from their waters. Next years have seen the collapse of the
Ottomans but not their political cooperation with the West and so
Sultan Abd ul Aziz was the first in the history of this country that
held political visit to France and Britain. In 1895. Hamid II lost
the war in the Balkans but won the war with Greece.
You
can read about it - http://www-studium.blogspot.com/p/obj9515.html
I'm
not surprised at all Miller and Litch they lived in 1840 and these
events took place in their days, they did not know that the future
will not confirm their theory about the collapse of the Ottomans,
today's pastors know this.They tell people untruths. The calculations
of these gentlemen for 1840 have not been fulfilled, calculating the
prophetic in the spring of 1843 about the end of the world, have not
been fulfilled, subsequent calculations on October 1844 did not come
true, they foretold God's judgment and the second coming of Jesus.
And Miller himself apologized for putting people into error. But
today Adventists say that all these calculations of these men are
true.
Adventism
does not have any evidence to substantiate the year 538 as the
establishment of papal supremacy. The only date certain in the arrest
of the pope in 1798 and from that date were subtracted 1,260 years of
prophetic predictions and came out the year 538 What says Adventism
"Then
(in the 538), according to the Adventist interpretation, Ostrogoths
inflicts a mortal blow, removing them from the political scene of the
then Europe. Writes about among others Dr. theology Angel Manuel
Rodriguez, working in Biblical Research Institute of the General
Conference of Seventh-day Adventists (Institute for Biblical Research
of the General Conference of Seventh-day Adventists) since 1992,
where since 2002 he served as director of BRI [2], in his book Future
Glory "
The
problem is that the Ostrogoths not ceased to exist in 538 years or
538 years were not followed by the fatal blow, laid siege to Rome. In
539 year they discontinue the siege and those are the only events of
this year. In the year 541. Authorities over the Ostrogoths took
Totylla and they became a power in Europe, Rome invaded twice and won
the Rome Pope fled to Constantinople. The fall of the Ostrogoths came
only in the 552 year. So we see how the above book Rodriguez
falsifies the history of this man represents the official position of
the church ADS as a representative of the highest authorities. None
of the pastors ADS objected to its publication. Books Advent falsify
history
papal
supremacy
The year 538 is not just the fall of the Ostrogoths. Adventists seeks here the beginning of papal supremacy.. In the Book A. Godek we can read
The year 538 is not just the fall of the Ostrogoths. Adventists seeks here the beginning of papal supremacy.. In the Book A. Godek we can read
"Especially
strongly supported the bishop of Rome the Byzantine emperor Justinian
I (527-565), which ... in his letter to the then bishop of Rome sent
in the first months of the year 533, declares that there can be no
doubt that everything that relates" the activities of churches,
was not to be brought to the attention of Your Holiness as the head
of all the churches. "This position is reflected in a legal act,
namely the amendment to the so-called. Code of Justinian; this is the
verdict of 131 he resolves that Your Holiness pope of old Rome is the
first of all clergy "(K.J Bulli. Daniel Book. p.191).
Godek
relied on K. Bullego. Bulli on Uriah Smith, that we have the official
position of the Church of ADS. More about the author read on
http://jeszcze7000.org/start/adwentyzm/daty/538/188-nowela-nr-131-justyniana-data-publikacji
But what's wrong? Reference was made to the Code of Justinian verdict
of 131 issued 533 years and that he entered into force in 538 years
and the snag in the mid verdict that was not released in only 533 but
in 545 years so he could not enter into force in 538
"Is history actually confirms that Justinian The amendment No. 131 was issued in the year 533? The answer is “no”. History fix the date of publication of this amendment on the year 545. Here's the evidence:
1 / Pierre Noailles on page 134 and 257 in the book Les Collections de Novelles de L? Empereur Justinien: Origine et Formation sous Justinien of 1912 provides the information that 131 This story was released in March 545 years. "Quote from the
"Is history actually confirms that Justinian The amendment No. 131 was issued in the year 533? The answer is “no”. History fix the date of publication of this amendment on the year 545. Here's the evidence:
1 / Pierre Noailles on page 134 and 257 in the book Les Collections de Novelles de L? Empereur Justinien: Origine et Formation sous Justinien of 1912 provides the information that 131 This story was released in March 545 years. "Quote from the
What are the
reactions today Adventists on this type of evidence? They believe the
publication of Advent Godek and Bullego not the truth. On the
Adventists are only suitable those who never check whether what they
teach is based on a true story. About what it can speak supremacy
when Pope Vigilius fled Rome in 545r, the people of Rome gave him
obscenities Bishops over which he had to have power called him from
the position of the Pope at the Council of 553. The Pope does not
have power. He was a puppet in the hands of the Emperor. He signed
everything that made him emperor. He did not have the power nor the
people nor the secular or the biskupami. Adwentyzm hit a ball in the
fence giving supremacy in the weakest time in the history of papal
authority
W.
Miller
Seeking the court's time on Earth Snow, Miller and Litcham sought confirmation historii.Zaczerpnięto together with Kaickiego calendar date in which someone mistook the date for Yom Kippur to 1844 which indicated 22 October instead of September 22, Today Karaites have rebelled against the Adventist date 22. X and say that in 1844 celebrated Yom Kippur in September. About 250 thousand supporters of Miller believed in his predictions and calculating the end of the world on day 22. X.1844 and nobody sprawdział whether the calculations are correct, / More about that on page http://www-studium.blogspot.com/p/ blog-page_18.html / and all Adventist pastors without checking assume that X 22. 1844 was the day of Yom Kippur, and I have not met such a pastor who could justify why they have selected the date of October 22.
Seeking the court's time on Earth Snow, Miller and Litcham sought confirmation historii.Zaczerpnięto together with Kaickiego calendar date in which someone mistook the date for Yom Kippur to 1844 which indicated 22 October instead of September 22, Today Karaites have rebelled against the Adventist date 22. X and say that in 1844 celebrated Yom Kippur in September. About 250 thousand supporters of Miller believed in his predictions and calculating the end of the world on day 22. X.1844 and nobody sprawdział whether the calculations are correct, / More about that on page http://www-studium.blogspot.com/p/ blog-page_18.html / and all Adventist pastors without checking assume that X 22. 1844 was the day of Yom Kippur, and I have not met such a pastor who could justify why they have selected the date of October 22.
year
508
1290 years and 1335 years that is, the difference is 45 years since 1290 leads to 1798 is to add 45 years gives us 1843 rather than 1844. This difference can not explain neither Miller nor contemporary Adventism. Because what by modern Adventists happened in 1843, NOTHING - it was a mistake which was corrected setting Millerites coming of Jesus for the year 1844. The whole calculation 2,300 years focused on 1844 in the same year was supposed to be the passage of Jesus from the holy place to the most holy and starts Pre-Millennium court. Is Adventism has some prophetic fulfillment in 1843, unfortunately not!
1290 years and 1335 years that is, the difference is 45 years since 1290 leads to 1798 is to add 45 years gives us 1843 rather than 1844. This difference can not explain neither Miller nor contemporary Adventism. Because what by modern Adventists happened in 1843, NOTHING - it was a mistake which was corrected setting Millerites coming of Jesus for the year 1844. The whole calculation 2,300 years focused on 1844 in the same year was supposed to be the passage of Jesus from the holy place to the most holy and starts Pre-Millennium court. Is Adventism has some prophetic fulfillment in 1843, unfortunately not!
Donation of Constantine
As the Psalm says "all people are lying," but those who are responsible for the faith of others and lie are pitiable. The Papal States / Vatican / built on a lie. The infallibility of popes built on a lie
As the Psalm says "all people are lying," but those who are responsible for the faith of others and lie are pitiable. The Papal States / Vatican / built on a lie. The infallibility of popes built on a lie
QUOTE
from the Christian apologetic Center
"The further development of papal primacy played a role three forgeries Vita Papae Silvestri (The Life of Pope Sylvester) from the beginning of the sixth century, donatio Constantini (Donation of Constantine) with approx. 750 years, and decrees Pseudo-Isidore, formed in the years 847-852.
"The further development of papal primacy played a role three forgeries Vita Papae Silvestri (The Life of Pope Sylvester) from the beginning of the sixth century, donatio Constantini (Donation of Constantine) with approx. 750 years, and decrees Pseudo-Isidore, formed in the years 847-852.
Donation
of Constantine presented a document allegedly issued by Emperor
Constantine the Great (306-337) for Pope Sylvester I (314-335). It
gave the Pope the power, dignity and honor granted to Caesar, and
over all bishops and all the churches around the world. This forgery
played a big role in the eleventh century, was the main argument of
Rome in the fight against the papacy of Byzantine Patriarch
Cerulariuszem. They showed it to him in 1054 legates of the Pope.
This document amused Greek scholars who recognize the Romans as
ignoramuses who do not know the tradition. But it only inflamed their
fanaticism (cursed). This document will be re-used against the Greeks
with "union" at the Council of Lyons (1274) and at the
Council of Florence (1439).
Decrees
Pseudo-Isidore assigned to the Spanish metropolitan Seville (ZZM.
636) contained the theory of papal infallibility, urge the
metropolitans to report to Rome the pallium Bishops (Palium - coat).
The bishops confer a right of appeal to Rome of Archbishop's
judgments. The decrees took on particular significance in the
eleventh century "
Comment
This forgery speaks of the papal supremacy. Why no one referred to the year 538 and the decree of Justinian's verdict 131. Falsyfikat was established in 8 century, and only on a forged document established State Church, and the pope was given authority over bishops. Verdict 131 of the 545 years refers to the earlier resolution on the power of the popes is not new by resolution, that there were no grounds to rely on this document, and previous resolutions did not give supremacy to the pope.
The decree from the days of ancient Israel
to rebuild the city of Jerusalem under Cyrus and Darius did not enter
into force. We read about it in books ADS. Justinian decree has not
entered into force because the pope had no authority over bishops,
because the one who issued the decree took authorities to the Pope
over bishops at the Council of Constantinople in 553 years, deprived
him of the papal throne. This decision overturned the decision issued
by it. The bishops could not deprive the Pope's authority without a
decision of the emperor. The emperor issued a decree and canceled it
himself. To sum up, no one in the history of the Catholic Church not
referred to the year 538 as the date supremacy, or even some special
events for the church, no council, no synod. There is no mention in
the writings of the bishops or popes of any supremacy in 538. The
only popes who believe in this date are Adventists. Even hostile to
Catholicism minority churches not discovered any events in the year
538 and 508. None of the Protestant churches are not relying on these
dates.
